Course Unit Code | Course Unit Title | Type of Course Unit | Year of Study | Semester | Number of ECTS Credits | İH114 | Islamic Legal Methodology II | Elective | 1 | 2 | 6 |
|
Level of Course Unit |
Second Cycle |
Objectives of the Course |
It is aimed to deal with the ongoing disputes by the procedural schools about the fiqh method, which reveals the methods and sources of reaching the Shari'ah provisions, and the effect of these conflicts on the furuya. |
Name of Lecturer(s) |
Prof. Dr. Tevhit Ayengin
Prof. Dr. Davut Yaylalı
Doç. Dr. Yusuf Şen
Doç. Dr. Yakup Mahmutoğlu |
Learning Outcomes |
1 | To be able to recognize the schools of fiqh method and to be able to dominate the relevant literature. | 2 | To be able to know the conflicts between procedural schools and their reasons. | 3 | Being able to see the ways of reaching the verdict by processing the reflection of procedural disputes in the furu | 4 | To be able to obtain a method to reach the verdict in current fiqh issues. |
|
Mode of Delivery |
Normal Education |
Prerequisites and co-requisities |
none |
Recommended Optional Programme Components |
none |
Course Contents |
Schools of Fiqh method, their understanding of method, the procedural differences between them and their reflection in the furu. |
Weekly Detailed Course Contents |
|
1 | The nature of the fiqh method. | | | 2 | The Birth of Islamic Law Methodology | | | 3 | Classical Fuqaha and Mutakallimin Schools | | | 4 | Memzuç profession and method understanding | | | 5 | Example procedural discussions on evidence | | | 6 | Example procedural discussions on provisions | | | 7 | Fiqh style discussions | | | 8 | Procedural discussions between members of different schools and their reflection on furu | | | 9 | Reasons for disagreement of the methodists who are members of the same school, their reflections on the ruling | | | 10 | Modern procedural debates | | | 11 | The idea of social fiqh | | | 12 | On the issue of the inadequacy of the methodical fiqh methodology | | | 13 | Current debates on ijtihad and taqlid | | | 14 | fiqh method today | | |
|
Recommended or Required Reading |
1. Zeküyiddîn Şaban, İslam Hukuk İlminin Esasları.2. Abdülkerim Zeydân, el-Vecîz fî usûli’l-fıkh3. Ömer Nasuhi Bilmen, Istilahat-ı Fıkhiyye Kamusu, I.4. Muhammed Ebû Zehre, İslam Hukuk Metodolojisi.5. Hayrettin Karaman, Fıkıh Usulü.6. Abdullah Kahraman, Fıkıh Usulü.7. Büyük Haydar Efendi, Usul-i Fıkıh Dersleri, İstanbul 1966; 8. Muhammed Ebu Zehra, İslâm Hukuku Metodolojisi, trc. Abdülkadir Şener, Ankara 1990; 9. Abdülkerim Zeydan, Fıkıh Usûlü, trc. Ruhi Özcan, Ankara 1982; |
Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods |
|
Assessment Methods and Criteria | |
Midterm Examination | 1 | 100 | SUM | 100 | |
Final Examination | 1 | 100 | SUM | 100 | Term (or Year) Learning Activities | 30 | End Of Term (or Year) Learning Activities | 70 | SUM | 100 |
| Language of Instruction | Turkish | Work Placement(s) | none |
|
Workload Calculation |
|
Midterm Examination | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Final Examination | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Individual Study for Mid term Examination | 89 | 1 | 89 |
Individual Study for Final Examination | 89 | 1 | 89 |
|
Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes |
|
* Contribution Level : 1 Very low 2 Low 3 Medium 4 High 5 Very High |
|
|