| Course Unit Code | Course Unit Title | Type of Course Unit | Year of Study | Semester | Number of ECTS Credits | | MEY109 | Using Argumentation in Mathematics Education | Elective | 1 | 1 | 6 |
|
| Level of Course Unit |
| Second Cycle |
| Objectives of the Course |
| To introduce teachers to the Argumentation Based Mathematics Learning Approach in Mathematics Education.
Designing and practicing the course of teachers in accordance with the Argumentation Based Science Learning |
| Name of Lecturer(s) |
| Dr.Öğr. Üyesi Betül KÜÇÜK DEMİR |
| Learning Outcomes |
| 1 | 1. Teachers will have knowledge about Argumentation Based Science Learning (ABSL) Approach. | | 2 | Teachers learn to use Argumentation Based Science Learning (ABSL) Approach in their lessons. |
|
| Mode of Delivery |
| Normal Education |
| Prerequisites and co-requisities |
|
| Recommended Optional Programme Components |
|
| Course Contents |
| Argumentation Based Science Learning (ABSL) Approach |
| Weekly Detailed Course Contents |
|
| 1 | The aim of the course | | | | 2 | Examination of articles about Argumentation Based Science Learning (ABSL) approach in mathematics education | | | | 3 | Examination of theses on Argumentation Based Science Learning (ABSL) Approach in Mathematics Education | | | | 4 | An examination of the theoretical framework of Argumentation Based Science Learning (ABSL) Approach | | | | 5 | Examining the Toulmin Argumentation Model | | | | 6 | Limitations of the Toulmin Argumentation Model | | | | 7 | The Role of Teachers in ABSL | | | | 8 | Mid term | | | | 9 | The Role of students in ABSL | | | | 10 | Argumentation and Mathematics Education | | | | 11 | Applications related to Argumentation Based Science Learning (ABSL) Approach | | | | 12 | Applications related to Argumentation Based Science Learning (ABSL) Approach | | | | 13 | Applications related to Argumentation Based Science Learning (ABSL) Approach | | | | 14 | Applications related to Argumentation Based Science Learning (ABSL) Approach | | | | 15 | Applications related to Argumentation Based Science Learning (ABSL) Approach | | | | 16 | Final | | |
|
| Recommended or Required Reading |
| 1. Aktamış, H. (2018). Örnek Etkinliklerle fen eğitimde Argümantasyon, Anı Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
2. Bilimsel çalışmalar |
| Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods |
|
| Assessment Methods and Criteria | |
| Midterm Examination | 1 | 100 | | SUM | 100 | |
| Final Examination | 1 | 100 | | SUM | 100 | | Term (or Year) Learning Activities | 30 | | End Of Term (or Year) Learning Activities | 70 | | SUM | 100 |
| | Language of Instruction | | | Work Placement(s) | | no |
|
| Workload Calculation |
|
| Midterm Examination | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Final Examination | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Attending Lectures | 14 | 2 | 28 |
| Practice | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| Individual Study for Mid term Examination | 14 | 2 | 28 |
| Individual Study for Final Examination | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Reading | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Homework | 14 | 2 | 28 |
|
| Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes |
| LO1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | | LO2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
|
| * Contribution Level : 1 Very low 2 Low 3 Medium 4 High 5 Very High |
 |
| |