| Course Unit Code | Course Unit Title | Type of Course Unit | Year of Study | Semester | Number of ECTS Credits | | SBK105 | Comparative Public Administration | Elective | 1 | 1 | 6 |
|
| Level of Course Unit |
| Second Cycle |
| Objectives of the Course |
| The aim of this course is to enable students to recognize the management systems applied by various countries in today's world, to learn the scientific methodologies for comparing these systems, and to compare countries from various aspects - implementation, reform, restructuring, etc. experiences |
| Name of Lecturer(s) |
| Doç. Dr. Sinan Yazıcı |
| Learning Outcomes |
| 1 | 1. Explains the concept of comparative country studies theoretically. It establishes the context of the core and peripheral countries | | 2 | 2. Knows and defines the basic concepts in the field of public administration and political science | | 3 | 3. Knows the Turkish public administration and determines the schools affected by the Turkish public administration. | | 4 | 4. Explain the main political/administrative systems in effect in the world | | 5 | 5. Compares the management systems of Türkiye and selected countries in the world. | | 6 | 6. Evaluates the functioning of the public administration and legislative executive judiciary organs in selected countries |
|
| Mode of Delivery |
| Normal Education |
| Prerequisites and co-requisities |
|
| Recommended Optional Programme Components |
|
| Course Contents |
| In this course, the importance, development, methodology of comparative public administration traditional and contemporary comparative public administration approaches are examined. The Turkish Public Administration, which is taken as the basis of comparison, and the public administration systems of the countries that affect or have the potential to affect our country are analyzed in a comparative perspective. Based on the management systems and practices of other countries, the changes in the world and country practices are evaluated, and the ways of transferring this information to the application in our country in the required fields are discussed. |
| Weekly Detailed Course Contents |
|
| 1 | Introduction to the Course, Introduction, Course Resources and Presentation | | | | 2 | Conceptually, the concept of comparative country studies: II. Period Before World War I | | | | 3 | Conceptually, the concept of comparative country studies: II. Period Before World War II | | | | 4 | Conceptually, the concept of comparative country studies: II. The Post-World War II Era | | | | 5 | Turkish Public Administration | | | | 6 | France Public Administration | | | | 7 | USA Public Administration | | | | 8 | Mid-term Exam | | | | 9 | Iranian Public Administration | | | | 10 | Nigerian Public Administration | | | | 11 | UK Public Administration | | | | 12 | Russian Public Administration | | | | 13 | Germany Public Administration | | | | 14 | Chinese Public Administration | | | | 15 | Evaluation studies on country reviews | | | | 16 | Final exam | | |
|
| Recommended or Required Reading |
| Güler, Birgül A. ve diğerleri (2009). Kamu Yönetimi Ülke İncelemeleri, Ankara: İmge Yayınevi
Önder Kutlu (2006), Karşılaştırmalı Kamu Yönetimi, Çizgi Kitapevi
Şenol Durgun, Burhan Aykaç, Çağdaş Siyasal Sistemler, Binyıl Yayınevi. |
| Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods |
|
| Assessment Methods and Criteria | |
| Midterm Examination | 1 | 100 | | SUM | 100 | |
| Final Examination | 1 | 100 | | SUM | 100 | | Term (or Year) Learning Activities | 40 | | End Of Term (or Year) Learning Activities | 60 | | SUM | 100 |
| | Language of Instruction | | | Work Placement(s) | |
|
| Workload Calculation |
|
| Midterm Examination | 1 | 90 | 90 |
| Final Examination | 1 | 90 | 90 |
|
| Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes |
| LO1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | | LO2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | | LO3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | | LO4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | | LO5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | | LO6 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
|
| * Contribution Level : 1 Very low 2 Low 3 Medium 4 High 5 Very High |
 |
| |