| Course Unit Code | Course Unit Title | Type of Course Unit | Year of Study | Semester | Number of ECTS Credits | | FD120A | The Problem of Theodise and Evil | Elective | 1 | 2 | 6 |
|
| Level of Course Unit |
| Second Cycle |
| Objectives of the Course |
| To produce evil in the universe and to analyse God and the universe, to produce goodness of God. |
| Name of Lecturer(s) |
| Prof. Dr. Tuncay İMAMOĞLU |
| Learning Outcomes |
| 1 | It has been taught the evil and theodicy | | 2 | It has been evaluated whether the goodness of God and evil are agreed | | 3 | It has been taught whether the evil is supported to the atheism | | 4 | It has been taught the evil and theodicy as general | | 5 | It has been evaluated whether the evil is necessary for will of human being | | 6 | It has been taught the solutions to the problem of evil |
|
| Mode of Delivery |
| Normal Education |
| Prerequisites and co-requisities |
| None |
| Recommended Optional Programme Components |
| None |
| Course Contents |
| 1- The meaning of evil in philosophical thought
2- The thoughts of philosophers about evil
3- The meaning of theodicy
4- The theories about evil
5- The defense of freewill
6- The theoriy of making soul
7- The views of logical and evidential evil
8- The evil as support of atheism
9- The evil in Islamic thought
10- The views of Ghazali on the best possible universe
11- The comparative views of Ghazali and Leibniz on the universe
12- The views of Islamic theologiers on the evil
13- Qur’anic theodicy
14- Theological theodicy |
| Weekly Detailed Course Contents |
|
| 1 | The meaning of evil in philosophical thought
| | | | 2 | The thoughts of philosophers about evil | | | | 3 | The meaning of theodicy | | | | 4 | The theories about evil | | | | 5 | The defense of freewill | | | | 6 | The theoriy of making soul | | | | 7 | The views of logical and evidential evil | | | | 8 | The evil as support of atheism | | | | 9 | The evil in Islamic thought | | | | 10 | The views of Ghazali on the best possible universe
| | | | 11 | The comparative views of Ghazali and Leibniz on the universe | | | | 12 | The views of Islamic theologiers on the evil | | | | 13 | Qur’anic theodicy | | | | 14 | Theological theodicy | | |
|
| Recommended or Required Reading |
| Textbook; C. Sadık Yaran, Kötülük ve Teodise, Metin Yasa, Tanrı ve Kötülük, Metin Özdemir, İslam Düşüncesinde Kötülük, Ruhattin Yazoğlu, Leibniz’de Tanrı ve Ahlâk, Tuncay İmamoğlu, Bir Tanrı Kanıtlaması Olarak Berkeley İdealizmi,Ruhattin Yazoğlu, Leibniz’de Tanrı ve Ahlâk Dinî Çoğulculuk Sorunu -John Hick Üzerine Bir Araştırma,Ruhattin Yazoğlu Ruh, ölüm ve ötesi, William T. Blacstone, Dinsel Bilgi Sorunu çev. Tuncay İMAMOĞLU, Tuncay İMAMOĞLU, Tanrının Doğası ve Mucizenin İmkanı, Tuncay İMAMOĞLU, Aydınlanma Filozofları Locke - Hume ve Berkeley, David Ray Griffin/ John B. Cobb,Süreç Teolojisi çev. Tuncay İMAMOĞLU/Ruhattin Yazoğlu.
Additional references; Mehmet Aydın, Din Felsefesi Eric Lee Ormsby, İslam Düşüncesinde İlahi Adalet Sorunu, Caharles Werner, Kötülük Problemi |
| Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods |
|
| Assessment Methods and Criteria | |
| Midterm Examination | 1 | 100 | | SUM | 100 | |
| Final Examination | 1 | 100 | | SUM | 100 | | Term (or Year) Learning Activities | 30 | | End Of Term (or Year) Learning Activities | 70 | | SUM | 100 |
| | Language of Instruction | | Turkish | | Work Placement(s) | | None |
|
| Workload Calculation |
|
| Midterm Examination | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Final Examination | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Attending Lectures | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Seminar | 5 | 5 | 25 |
| Self Study | 10 | 3 | 30 |
| Individual Study for Mid term Examination | 1 | 15 | 15 |
| Individual Study for Final Examination | 1 | 30 | 30 |
| Homework | 7 | 5 | 35 |
|
| Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes |
|
| * Contribution Level : 1 Very low 2 Low 3 Medium 4 High 5 Very High |
 |
| |