Course Unit Code | Course Unit Title | Type of Course Unit | Year of Study | Semester | Number of ECTS Credits | OTDK | Danışmanlık | Elective | 1 | 2 | 6 |
|
Level of Course Unit |
Second Cycle |
Objectives of the Course |
The advisor should ensure that the graduate thesis is done correctly by making the necessary academic guidance of the faculty member. |
Name of Lecturer(s) |
Doç. Dr. Volkan GÜL |
Learning Outcomes |
1 | 1- Having information about the responsibilities of the advisor and the student | 2 | 2- Having information about the consultant's expectations | 3 | Ability to search for resources in the research process | 4 | Ability to apply the research process | 5 | They gain the ability to design experiments, evaluate and interpret the results obtained in order to solve the problems related to the study subject. | 6 | They develop the ability to follow up-to-date information on the subject of study and to write a thesis. |
|
Mode of Delivery |
Normal Education |
Prerequisites and co-requisities |
non |
Recommended Optional Programme Components |
no |
Course Contents |
By putting the student in the center, in the selection of the research topic and problem; To guide the method to be applied, data collection, data evaluation and the preparation of the research in accordance with the thesis writing rules. |
Weekly Detailed Course Contents |
|
1 | .Information about the student-advisor relationship | . | . | 2 | Evaluating advisor and student expectations | | | 3 | Discussing the proposals in determining the research topic | | | 4 | Reviewing the literature on the research topic | | | 5 | Reviewing the literature on the research topic | | | 6 | Reviewing the literature on the research topic | | | 7 | Determining the research method | | | 8 | Identifying and starting the research process | | | 9 | Research process evaluation | | | 10 | Research process evaluation | | | 11 | Research process evaluation | | | 12 | Research process evaluation | | | 13 | Research process evaluation | | | 14 | Research process evaluation | | | 15 | Finalization and examination of the research process | | |
|
Recommended or Required Reading |
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, E. A., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2010). Scientific research methods (5th edition) Pegem Akademi.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design choosing among five traditions. sage.
Creswell, J. W. (2015). Qualitative research methods: Research and research design according to five approaches (M. Tüm & S. B. Demir, Trans.). Political. |
Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods |
|
Assessment Methods and Criteria | |
Midterm Examination | 1 | 5 | Quiz | 1 | 10 | Attending Lectures | 14 | 5 | Laboratory | 1 | 5 | Field Work | 4 | 10 | Project Presentation | 1 | 10 | Seminar | 1 | 15 | Self Study | 14 | 5 | Individual Study for Quiz | 1 | 15 | Homework | 1 | 20 | SUM | 100 | |
Final Examination | 1 | 2 | Individual Study for Final Examination | 1 | 98 | SUM | 100 | Term (or Year) Learning Activities | 40 | End Of Term (or Year) Learning Activities | 60 | SUM | 100 |
| Language of Instruction | Turkish | Work Placement(s) | no |
|
Workload Calculation |
|
Midterm Examination | 14 | 2 | 28 |
Final Examination | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Field Work | 6 | 4 | 24 |
Individual Study for Mid term Examination | 14 | 4 | 56 |
Individual Study for Final Examination | 14 | 4 | 56 |
Homework | 1 | 4 | 4 |
|
Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes |
LO1 | 3 | | | | | | | 3 | | | | 5 | | | | 3 | | | 4 | | | 4 | | | LO2 | 4 | | | | | | | 4 | | | | 4 | | | | 5 | | | 4 | | | 4 | | | LO3 | 3 | | | | | | | 4 | | | | 4 | | | | 4 | | | 5 | | | 5 | | | LO4 | 4 | | | | | | | 5 | | | | 5 | | | | 4 | | | 4 | | | 5 | | | LO5 | 4 | | | | | | | 3 | | | | 3 | | | | 4 | | | 3 | | | 4 | | | LO6 | 5 | | | | | | | 4 | | | | 5 | | | | 5 | | | 5 | | | 5 | | |
|
* Contribution Level : 1 Very low 2 Low 3 Medium 4 High 5 Very High |
|
|