Course Unit Code | Course Unit Title | Type of Course Unit | Year of Study | Semester | Number of ECTS Credits | ILA317.20 | Methods and Techniques in Religious Teaching | Elective | 3 | 5 | 3 |
|
Level of Course Unit |
First Cycle |
Objectives of the Course |
This subject aim teachinh nation and national religion educational politicas |
Name of Lecturer(s) |
Ömer Demir |
Learning Outcomes |
1 | student knows religion education politicas | 2 | student knows religion education and society interaction | 3 | Analyze the relationship between religious education and politics. | 4 | Knows the factors affecting religious education policies. | 5 | Understands the necessity of religious education. | 6 | Knows the formation process of religious education and religious policies. |
|
Mode of Delivery |
Normal Education |
Prerequisites and co-requisities |
None |
Recommended Optional Programme Components |
None |
Course Contents |
Religious policies in the historical process, religious education, religious education policies and the relations between them, curricula and religious education policy, madrasahs in the Islamic world, law and religious education policy, religious groups and religious education |
Weekly Detailed Course Contents |
|
1 | Religious Policies in Turkey | | | 2 | Education community interaction | | | 3 | Religion-state relations and religion policies | | | 4 | The need for religious education | | | 5 | European Union reports and religious education | | | 6 | Religious education policies in European countries | | | 7 | First Exam | | | 8 | Religious education policies, Alevism | | | 9 | Elective religion courses | | | 10 | Compulsory religion classes | | | 11 | Non-formal religious education policies | | | 12 | Presidency of Religious Affairs and Religious Education | | | 13 | Religious Education policies and religious groups | | | 14 | Final Exam | | |
|
Recommended or Required Reading |
Kemal İnal, Din Politikaları ve Eğitime Etkileri, Dem Dergi, Yıl 1 Sayı 2
Recep Kaymakcan, Türkiye´de Din Eğitimi Politikaları Üzerine Düşünceler, Ekev Akademi Dergisi‹ Yıl 1: 10 Say›: 27 (Bahar 2006)
İbrahim Turan, Avrupa Birliği Sürecinde Türkiye´de Din Eğitimi Politikaları, İz. Yay. 2013 |
Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods |
|
Assessment Methods and Criteria | |
Midterm Examination | 1 | 100 | SUM | 100 | |
Final Examination | 1 | 100 | SUM | 100 | Term (or Year) Learning Activities | 40 | End Of Term (or Year) Learning Activities | 60 | SUM | 100 |
| Language of Instruction | | Work Placement(s) | None |
|
Workload Calculation |
|
Midterm Examination | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Final Examination | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Individual Study for Mid term Examination | 2 | 20 | 40 |
Individual Study for Final Examination | 2 | 20 | 40 |
|
Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes |
LO1 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 | LO2 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | LO3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | LO4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 5 | LO5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | LO6 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
|
* Contribution Level : 1 Very low 2 Low 3 Medium 4 High 5 Very High |
|
|