| Course Unit Code | Course Unit Title | Type of Course Unit | Year of Study | Semester | Number of ECTS Credits | | F214GK4 | Misconceptions | Elective | 2 | 4 | 3 |
|
| Level of Course Unit |
| First Cycle |
| Objectives of the Course |
| The aim of this course is to comprehend the concepts and definitions of concepts, concepts and misconceptions in concept teaching, important misconceptions related to basic science concepts and the reasons of their occurrence. |
| Name of Lecturer(s) |
| Arş. Gör. Dr. Ebru MAZLUM GÜVEN |
| Learning Outcomes |
| 1 | Understand concept and concept features | | 2 | Comprehend the misconceptions and their reasons. | | 3 | Knows and applies the method techniques and Web 2.0 tools to be used in teaching concepts. |
|
| Mode of Delivery |
| Normal Education |
| Prerequisites and co-requisities |
| None |
| Recommended Optional Programme Components |
| None |
| Course Contents |
| General characteristics of concepts, importance of concepts, concept teaching techniques, misconceptions and their elimination, Web 2.0 in concept teaching. |
| Weekly Detailed Course Contents |
|
| 1 | Meaningful Learning and Constructivism Theory in Science Teaching | | | | 2 | Concepts and features | | | | 3 | The importance of concepts in teaching | | | | 4 | Teaching Concept | | | | 5 | Graphical Tools Used in Concept Teaching (Concept Maps, Concept Networks, Semantic Analysis Tables, etc.) | | | | 6 | Graphical Tools Used in Concept Teaching (Concept Maps, Concept Networks, Semantic Analysis Tables, etc.) | | | | 7 | Graphical Tools Used in Concept Teaching (Concept Maps, Concept Networks, Semantic Analysis Tables, etc.) | | | | 8 | Midterm exam | | | | 9 | Examination of common misconceptions in science (Physics) | | | | 10 | Examination of common misconceptions in science (Chemistry) | | | | 11 | Examination of common misconceptions in science (Biology) | | | | 12 | Web 2.0 in concept teaching | | | | 13 | Web 2.0 in concept teaching-2 | | | | 14 | Web 2.0 in concept teaching-3 | | | | 15 | Final exam | | |
|
| Recommended or Required Reading |
| Tatlı, Z. (2020). Kavram Öğretiminde Web 2.0. PEgem Akademi.
Coştu, B., Şendur, G. (2018). Kavram Öğretimi (p.41-84). In Tekbıyık, A., Çakmakçı, G. (Eds) Fen Bilimleri Öğretimi ve STEM Etkinlikleri, Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık, Ankara. |
| Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods |
|
| Assessment Methods and Criteria | |
| Midterm Examination | 1 | 100 | | SUM | 100 | |
| Final Examination | 1 | 100 | | SUM | 100 | | Term (or Year) Learning Activities | 40 | | End Of Term (or Year) Learning Activities | 60 | | SUM | 100 |
| | Language of Instruction | | Turkish | | Work Placement(s) | | None |
|
| Workload Calculation |
|
| Midterm Examination | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Final Examination | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Attending Lectures | 2 | 4 | 8 |
| Self Study | 7 | 6 | 42 |
| Individual Study for Mid term Examination | 2 | 5 | 10 |
| Individual Study for Final Examination | 2 | 8 | 16 |
| Reading | 2 | 4 | 8 |
|
| Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes |
| LO1 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | | LO2 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | | LO3 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
|
| * Contribution Level : 1 Very low 2 Low 3 Medium 4 High 5 Very High |
 |
| |