Course Unit Code | Course Unit Title | Type of Course Unit | Year of Study | Semester | Number of ECTS Credits | FS0104.2 | Quality Improvement Methods | Elective | 4 | 8 | 3 |
|
Level of Course Unit |
First Cycle |
Objectives of the Course |
Quality and improvement will be taking advantage of the tools and methods to examine |
Name of Lecturer(s) |
|
Learning Outcomes |
1 | 1) knows the relationship between quality and definition of Variability | 2 | 2) quality definition and concept knows | 3 | 3) evaluates the quality problems with statistical methods | 4 | 4) knows the definition of the Quality Management | 5 | 5) seeking to improve Quality, continuous improvement knows | 6 | 6) error type and effects analysis method of | 7 | 7) stands for Quality Function (KFA) knows the method | 8 | 8) six sigma method definition knows | 9 | 9) six sigma method implements the application steps | 10 | creates and process Control diagram 10) makes the qualification analysis |
|
Mode of Delivery |
Normal Education |
Prerequisites and co-requisities |
None |
Recommended Optional Programme Components |
None |
Course Contents |
Variability, quality and general concepts of quality, continuous improvement, FMEA method, KFA method, six sigma, statistical process control and control scheme, 5S, total productive maintenance, constraint theory, experiment design, Taguchi method |
Weekly Detailed Course Contents |
|
1 | Variability in a relationship definition and quality | | | 2 | Quality description and general concepts | | | 3 | Statistical inference | | | 4 | Quality management | | | 5 | Seeking to improve quality, continuous improvement | | | 6 | Error type and effects analysis method | | | 7 | Stands For Quality Function | | | 8 | Six Sigma | | | 9 | 5s, total productive maintenance | | | 10 | Theory Of Constraints | | | 11 | Experiment Design | | | 12 | Taguchi Method | | | 13 | Analysis Of Variance | | | 14 | Lean Manufacturing | | | 15 | | | | 16 | | | |
|
Recommended or Required Reading |
Six Sigma Moisture Godbole, Ayşe Oğuzlar, Vipaş Inc., 2003. |
Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods |
|
Assessment Methods and Criteria | |
Midterm Examination | 1 | 75 | Project Presentation | 1 | 25 | SUM | 100 | |
Final Examination | 1 | 100 | SUM | 100 | Term (or Year) Learning Activities | 40 | End Of Term (or Year) Learning Activities | 60 | SUM | 100 |
| Language of Instruction | Turkish | Work Placement(s) | None |
|
Workload Calculation |
|
Midterm Examination | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Final Examination | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Attending Lectures | 14 | 2 | 28 |
Report Presentation | 1 | 5 | 5 |
Self Study | 14 | 2 | 28 |
Individual Study for Mid term Examination | 1 | 10 | 10 |
Individual Study for Final Examination | 1 | 12 | 12 |
|
Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes |
LO1 | | | | | | | LO2 | | | | | | | LO3 | | | | | | | LO4 | | | | | | | LO5 | | | | | | | LO6 | | | | | | | LO7 | | | | | | | LO8 | | | | | | | LO9 | | | | | | | LO10 | | | | | | |
|
* Contribution Level : 1 Very low 2 Low 3 Medium 4 High 5 Very High |
|
|