|
Description of Individual Course UnitsCourse Unit Code | Course Unit Title | Type of Course Unit | Year of Study | Semester | Number of ECTS Credits | FS0305.2 | Reading Education | Elective | 3 | 6 | 3 |
| Level of Course Unit | First Cycle | Objectives of the Course | To make students comprehend the importance of reading skills in terms of teaching Turkish, to enable students to master reading methods and techniques and to gain the ability to use them effectively in teaching activities. To be able to provide reading guidance to students by mastering the children's works for the target audience together with the distinguished works of Turkish and world literature. | Name of Lecturer(s) | Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Bahadır Gülden | Learning Outcomes | 1 | The students will be able to; comprehend and define mental and physical process of reading. | 2 | The students will be able to; define the necessities for wide spreading reading habits in society and analyze techniques about reading skills. | 3 | The students will be able to; evaluate different ways of improving reading education in Turkish instruction and argue these evaluations. |
| Mode of Delivery | Normal Education | Prerequisites and co-requisities | None | Recommended Optional Programme Components | None | Course Contents | To have knowledge about the place and importance of reading skill in Turkish teaching. Purposes and functions of reading achievements in Turkish Curriculum. Theoretical and practical applications about reading methods. Qualities of reading texts. The effect of reading skill on vocabulary development. Reading texts in Turkish textbooks and their qualities | Weekly Detailed Course Contents | |
1 | Introduction to the conceptual framework.
Read
Reading text
Reading process
Reader
Reading habit
reading interest
reading attitude
reading anxiety
contingency
visual reading
Acceptability
reading with comprehension
Vocabulary
text type
intertextuality
Textuality criteria
Reading speed
reading comprehension | | | 2 | Basic concepts
Literacy
legibility
Theme/theme
common reading
literary reading
intensive reading | | | 3 | The Place and Importance of Reading Skill in the Turkish Curriculum
Target Gains | | | 4 | Issues regarding the acquisition of reading target achievements | | | 5 | Reading Methods and Techniques | QUIET READING
READING ALOUD
SCREEN READING
SUMMERIZING READING
READING TAKING NOTES | | 6 | READING METHOD BY MARKING
READING BY GUESSING
READING BY ASKING QUESTIONS
WORD CHOIR
READING THEATER
MEMORIZING
ASSOCIATING WITH TEXTS
READING BY DISCUSSION
CRITICAL READING | | | 7 | Mid-term Exam | | | 8 | | An application to ensure that volunteer students acquire reading skill target achievements based on methods and techniques. | | 9 | | An application to ensure that volunteer students acquire reading skill target achievements based on methods and techniques | | 10 | | An application to ensure that volunteer students acquire reading skill target achievements based on methods and techniques | | 11 | | An application to ensure that volunteer students acquire reading skill target achievements based on methods and techniques | | 12 | | An application to ensure that volunteer students acquire reading skill target achievements based on methods and techniques | | 13 | | An application to ensure that volunteer students acquire reading skill target achievements based on methods and techniques | | 14 | | Test of the final | |
| Recommended or Required Reading | Pinker, S., Jackendoff, R. (2009). The Components of Language: What’s Specific to Language, and What’s Specific to Humans? In M. Christiansen, C. Collins, S. Edelman (Eds.), Language Universals, 126-151. NY: OUP.
Pinker S. and Jackendoff, R. (2005). The faculty of language: What’s Special About it? Cognition, 95, 201-236.
Just, M.A. and Carpenter, P. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149.
Otero, J., León, J.A. and Graesser, A.C. (2002). The Psychology of Science Text Comprehension. LEA.
Pinker S. and Jackendoff, R. (2005). The faculty of language: What’s Special About it? Cognition, 95, 201-236.
Just, M.A. and Carpenter, P.A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329-354.
Anderson, R.C. (2004). Role of the reader’s schema in comprehension, learning and memory. In Robert B. Ruddell et al. (Editors), Theoretical models and processes of reading (fifth edition). International Reading Association, Newark, DE.
Altmann, G.T.M. (1997). The ascent of Babel: An exploration of language, mind, and understanding. Oxford University Press.
Ashcraft, M.H. (2002). Cognition (3rd Ed.). NJ: Prentice Hall.
Fletcher, C.R. (1981). Short-term memory processes in text comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 564-574.
Gough, P.B. (1972). One second of reading. In J.F. Kavanagh and I.G. Mattingly (Eds.). Language by Ear and Eye (pp.332-358). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Rumelhart, D. E. (2004). Toward an interactive model of reading. In Robert B. Ruddell et al. (Eds.). Theoretical Models And Processes of Reading, (Fifth Edition): International Reading Association, Newark, DE.
Huey, E.B. (1908). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. NY: Macmillan.
Just, M.A. and Carpenter, P.A. (1987). The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Newton, MA: Allyn Bacon.
Just, M.A. and Carpenter, P.A. (1984). Using eye fixations to study reading comprehension. In D. Kieras and M. Just (Eds.). New Methods in Reading Comprehension Research (151-182). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Just, M.A. and Carpenter, P. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149.
Just, M.A. and Carpenter, P.A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329-354.
Kobayashı, M. (2002). Method effects on reading comprehension test performance: Text organization and response format. Language Testing, 19 (2) 193-220.
Kintsch, W. (1992). A cognitive architecture for comprehension. In H.L, Pick, Jr., P. van den Broek and D.C. Knill (Eds.). Cognition: Conceptual and Methological Issues. Washington, DC: APA.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
La Berge, D. and Samuels, S.J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.
Mcclelland, J.L, Rumelhart, D.E. (1988). Explorations in Parallel Distributed Processing: A Handbook of Models, Programs, and Exercises. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mcclelland, J.L. (1989). Parallel Distributed Processing: Implications for Cognition and Development. In R.G.M. Morris (Ed.). Parallel Distributed Processing: Implications for Psychology and Neurobiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods | | Assessment Methods and Criteria | |
Midterm Examination | 1 | 100 | SUM | 100 | |
Final Examination | 1 | 100 | SUM | 100 | Term (or Year) Learning Activities | 40 | End Of Term (or Year) Learning Activities | 60 | SUM | 100 |
| Language of Instruction | Turkish | Work Placement(s) | None |
| Workload Calculation | |
Midterm Examination | 1 | 1 | 1 | Final Examination | 1 | 2 | 2 | Self Study | 1 | 7 | 7 | Individual Study for Homework Problems | 1 | 2 | 2 | Individual Study for Mid term Examination | 4 | 5 | 20 | Individual Study for Final Examination | 3 | 10 | 30 | Reading | 2 | 4 | 8 | Homework | 4 | 5 | 20 | |
Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes | | * Contribution Level : 1 Very low 2 Low 3 Medium 4 High 5 Very High |
|
|
|
|