| Course Unit Code | Course Unit Title | Type of Course Unit | Year of Study | Semester | Number of ECTS Credits | | EM411.2B | Multi Criteria Decision Making | Elective | 4 | 7 | 4 |
|
| Level of Course Unit |
| First Cycle |
| Objectives of the Course |
| If more than one criteria/factors, depending on the expert reviews and some decision problems to be solved as a group solution techniques are taught. |
| Name of Lecturer(s) |
| Doç. Dr. Hamid YILMAZ |
| Learning Outcomes |
| 1 | to be able to determine the factors that contribute to a problem | | 2 | multi-criteria problems using appropriate methods to identify the criteria weights | | 3 | multi-criteria problems as expert reviews and group decision making resolve | | 4 | To describe the basic concepts of compromise programming. | | 5 | The goal is to develop mathematical models for programming problems. |
|
| Mode of Delivery |
| Normal Education |
| Prerequisites and co-requisities |
| None |
| Recommended Optional Programme Components |
| None |
| Course Contents |
| Introduction and basic concepts, multi-criteria and group decision making, Analytical Hierarchy process (AHS) Method, Analytic Network Process (AAS) Method, DEMATEL Method, TOPSIS Method, the use of AAS and AAS DEMATEL and Methods TOPSIS Methods with the use of VIKOR with the method of the PROMETHEE method of Grey Relationship Analysis |
| Weekly Detailed Course Contents |
|
| 1 | Introduction and basic concepts | | | | 2 | Multi-criteria and group decision making | | | | 3 | Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHS) Method | | | | 4 | Analytic Network Process (AAS) Method | | | | 5 | DEMATEL Method | | | | 6 | TOPSIS Method | | | | 7 | Use methods of DEMATEL and AAS | | | | 8 | Midterm Exam | | | | 9 | Use of AAS and TOPSIS Methods | | | | 10 | VIKOR Method | | | | 11 | PROMETHEE Method | | | | 12 | Grey Association Analysis | | | | 13 | Project Presentations | | | | 14 | Project Presentations | | | | 15 | Project Presentations | | |
|
| Recommended or Required Reading |
| Nolberto Munier (2011), A Strategy for Using Multicriteria Analysis of Decision-Making: A Guide for Simple and Complex Environmental Projects
Cengiz Kahraman (2008), Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making: Theory and Applications with Recent Developments |
| Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods |
|
| Assessment Methods and Criteria | |
| Midterm Examination | 1 | 62 | | Project Presentation | 1 | 38 | | SUM | 100 | |
| Final Examination | 1 | 100 | | SUM | 100 | | Term (or Year) Learning Activities | 40 | | End Of Term (or Year) Learning Activities | 60 | | SUM | 100 |
| | Language of Instruction | | Turkish | | Work Placement(s) | | None |
|
| Workload Calculation |
|
| Midterm Examination | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Final Examination | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Attending Lectures | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Project Presentation | 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Self Study | 14 | 2 | 28 |
| Individual Study for Mid term Examination | 1 | 14 | 14 |
| Individual Study for Final Examination | 1 | 18 | 18 |
|
| Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes |
| LO1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | | LO2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | | LO3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | | LO4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | | LO5 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
|
| * Contribution Level : 1 Very low 2 Low 3 Medium 4 High 5 Very High |
 |
| |