| Course Unit Code | Course Unit Title | Type of Course Unit | Year of Study | Semester | Number of ECTS Credits | | SB401B | Comparative Public Administration | Compulsory | 4 | 7 | 6 |
|
| Level of Course Unit |
| First Cycle |
| Objectives of the Course |
| To explain the concept of comparative country studies theoretically, to examine the examples of public administration in the world and to evaluate their similarities and differences with the public administration understanding in Turkey. |
| Name of Lecturer(s) |
| Doç. Dr. Sinan Yazıcı |
| Learning Outcomes |
| 1 | Explains the concept of comparative country studies theoretically. It establishes the context of the core and peripheral countries | | 2 | Knows and defines the basic concepts in the field of public administration and political science. | | 3 | Knows the Turkish public administration and determines the schools affected by the Turkish public administration | | 4 | Explain the main political/administrative systems in effect in the world | | 5 | Compares the management systems of Türkiye and selected countries in the world | | 6 | Evaluates the functioning of the public administration and legislative executive judiciary organs in selected countries |
|
| Mode of Delivery |
| Normal Education |
| Prerequisites and co-requisities |
| None |
| Recommended Optional Programme Components |
| None |
| Course Contents |
| In the content of this course, theoretically establishing the concept of comparative country studies and the context of core and peripheral countries. To know and define the basic concepts in the field of public administration and political science. Knowing the Turkish public administration and expressing the schools in which Turkish public administration is affected. There are topics such as opening the main political/administrative systems in force in the world and comparing the administrative systems of Turkey and selected countries in the world. |
| Weekly Detailed Course Contents |
|
| 1 | Introduction to the Course, Introduction, Course Resources and Presentation | | | | 2 | Conceptually, the concept of comparative country studies: II. Period Before World War I | | | | 3 | Conceptually, the concept of comparative country studies: II. Pre-World War II Era | | | | 4 | Conceptually, the concept of comparative country studies: II. The Post-World War II Era | | | | 5 | Turkish Public Administration | | | | 6 | French Public Administration | | | | 7 | US Public Administration | | | | 8 | Midterm exam | | | | 9 | Iranian Public Administration | | | | 10 | Nigerian Public Administration | | | | 11 | UK Public Administration | | | | 12 | Russian Public Administration | | | | 13 | .Public Administration in Germany | | | | 14 | Chinese Public Administration | | | | 15 | Evaluation studies on country studies | | |
|
| Recommended or Required Reading |
| Güler, Birgül A. ve diğerleri (2009). Kamu Yönetimi Ülke İncelemeleri, Ankara: İmge Yayınevi
Önder Kutlu (2006), Karşılaştırmalı Kamu Yönetimi, Çizgi Kitapevi
Şenol Durgun, Burhan Aykaç, Çağdaş Siyasal Sistemler, Binyıl Yayınevi.
John McCormick (2020) Karşılaştırmalı Siyaset ve Yönetim Sistemleri |
| Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods |
|
| Assessment Methods and Criteria | |
| Midterm Examination | 1 | 100 | | SUM | 100 | |
| Final Examination | 1 | 100 | | SUM | 100 | | Term (or Year) Learning Activities | 40 | | End Of Term (or Year) Learning Activities | 60 | | SUM | 100 |
| | Language of Instruction | | Turkish | | Work Placement(s) | | None |
|
| Workload Calculation |
|
| Midterm Examination | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Final Examination | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Attending Lectures | 14 | 3 | 42 |
| Self Study | 14 | 4 | 56 |
| Individual Study for Mid term Examination | 7 | 4 | 28 |
| Individual Study for Final Examination | 14 | 4 | 56 |
|
| Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes |
| LO1 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 3 | | LO2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | | LO3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | | LO4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | | LO5 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | | LO6 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
|
| * Contribution Level : 1 Very low 2 Low 3 Medium 4 High 5 Very High |
 |
| |