|
Description of Individual Course UnitsCourse Unit Code | Course Unit Title | Type of Course Unit | Year of Study | Semester | Number of ECTS Credits | KY305B | Comparative Government | Compulsory | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| Level of Course Unit | First Cycle | Objectives of the Course | The course aims to compare and examine the administrative structures of different states, which diverge from each other by their political and administrative organizations, both from a conceptual and practical perspective. | Name of Lecturer(s) | | Learning Outcomes | 1 | To obtain basic knowledge on administrative structures of different states with distinct political and administrative organization systems and ways of operations regarding these systems. ; | 2 | To understand the basic differences regarding political, administrative and juridical structures between selected countries through a comparative perspective.; | 3 | To examine the administrative systems of France, USA, England, Germany, Belgium, Holland, Ukraine, Sweden, Switzerland, Argentina, Brazil, Nigeria, Egypt, Turkic Republics of Middle Asia, Japan, China, India and Russia.; | 4 | To compare the administrative organizations of those countries mentioned in the book with that of Turkey. | 5 | To be able to evaluate public administration systems through a scientific perspective and with a national as well as an international understanding |
| Mode of Delivery | Normal Education | Prerequisites and co-requisities | None | Recommended Optional Programme Components | None | Course Contents | To obtain basic knowledge on administrative structures of different states with distinct political and administrative organization systems and ways of operations regarding these systems. ;
| Weekly Detailed Course Contents | |
1 | The Administrative Organisation of the Federal Republic of Germany in terms of: a) Central government, b) Local governments and, c) How it differs from Turkish public administrative structure. | | | 2 | The Administrative Organisation of France in terms of: a) Central government, b) Local governments and, c) How it differs from Turkish public administrative structure. | | | 3 | The Administrative Organisation of England in terms of: a) Central government, b) Local governments and, c) How it differs from Turkish public administrative structure. | | | 4 | The Administrative Organisation of Spain in terms of: a) Central government, b) Local governments and, c) How it differs from Turkish public administrative structure. | | | 5 | The Administrative Organisation of Italy in terms of: a) Central government, b) Local governments and, c) How it differs from Turkish public administrative structure. | | | 6 | The Administrative Organisation of Holland in terms of: a) Central government, b) Local governments and, c) How it differs from Turkish public administrative structure. | | | 7 | The Administrative Organisation of Greece in terms of: a) Central government, b) Local governments and, c) How it differs from Turkish public administrative structure. MIDTERM EXAM | | | 8 | The Administrative Organisation of Russia in terms of: a) Central government, b) Local governments and, c) How it differs from Turkish public administrative structure. | | | 9 | The Administrative Organisation of USA in terms of: a) Central government, b) Local governments and, c) How it differs from Turkish public administrative structure. | | | 10 | The Administrative Organisation of Japan in terms of: a) Central government, b) Local governments and, c) How it differs from Turkish public administrative structure. | | | 11 | The Administrative Organisation of Bulgaria in terms of: a) Central government, b) Local governments and, c) How it differs from Turkish public administrative structure. | | | 12 | The Administrative Organisation of Romania in terms of: a) Central government, b) Local governments and, c) How it differs from Turkish public administrative structure. | | | 13 | The Administrative Organisation of the Republic of South Africa in terms of: a) Central government, b) Local governments and, c) How it differs from Turkish public administrative structure. | | | 14 | The Administrative Organisation of New Zealand in terms of: a) Central government, b) Local governments and, c) How it differs from Turkish public administrative structure. | | | 15 | | | | 16 | | | |
| Recommended or Required Reading | | Planned Learning Activities and Teaching Methods | | Assessment Methods and Criteria | |
Midterm Examination | 1 | 100 | SUM | 100 | |
Final Examination | 1 | 100 | SUM | 100 | Term (or Year) Learning Activities | 40 | End Of Term (or Year) Learning Activities | 60 | SUM | 100 |
| Language of Instruction | Turkish | Work Placement(s) | None |
| Workload Calculation | |
Midterm Examination | 1 | 90 | 90 | Final Examination | 1 | 90 | 90 | |
Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes | LO1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | LO2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | LO3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | LO4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | LO5 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| * Contribution Level : 1 Very low 2 Low 3 Medium 4 High 5 Very High |
|
|
|
|